Monday, 20 January 2014

Semester 2 Week 1: Curriculum Theories





What is the meaning of Curriculum as it is applicable within your context?


In my role as manager in an acute health-care setting, I look at curriculum in several ways.  While I don't teach curriculum per se, I am responsible for leading a wide variety of staff who come with varying degrees of education and experience depending, on their specific role, in the health care setting. 

One way I view the application of Curriculum and it's challenges in my area is with regard to my formal and informal communication with the various staff I serve.  I am responsible for multiple staff who possess a wide range of education; from staff with grade 12 education and a post-secondary certificate programs (e.g. care aid, unit clerks) to advanced level Nurse Clinicians who have either a baccalaureate degree or a Master's degree in addition to specific certifications in their specialized Geriatric field qualifying them to practice. My staff come with different life experiences: some moved here from different countries with different values and cultural support; some staff has the additional challenge of English as their second language. I think of the importance of being reflexive and I am constantly challenged to communicate effectively with all staff.  I must provide each of them with applicable tools and ongoing relevant education at staff meetings or through memos and emails detailing the ever-changing new policies, mandatory education, new patient products and ongoing best practice updates.  My leadership style, method of communication and content of my communication must adapt and change in order to be most effective in meeting the unique needs of each staff member.  The mode of communication is very important.  It's important not to be presumptuous and assume everyone owns a computer or can navigate a computer.  It is important to provide communication through multiple formats; not only through web based modules but also "demonstrative" and interactive methods. 
Another way I view curriculum in my area is in terms of the diversity of staff in my area, I think that one key aspect of particular importance is to offer multiple venues for "learning".  The content must be flexible and relevant. In health care, best practice is to provide "patient -centered care" which means to incorporate the "who and what" of that patient into planning care.  I think that similarly this can be applied to learners and "person -centered learning" takes into account unique styles, needs and context (e.g. communicate not just by email - it is important to provide hard copies and display in areas where staff who aren't as "computer savvy").  



As I was reflecting and digesting the information from the articles discussed in class (Kieran Egan's 1978 article on What is Curriculum?;  J. Abner Peddiwell's "The Saber-Tooth Curriculum" article;  and Latta and Kim's  2011 article featuring Narrative Inquiry as a pedagogical medium as well as the video on learning through real life experiences). What really stood out for me was the importance and power of the narrative inquiry in Latta and Kim's article. I am intrigued by its possibility and usefulness as a tool as it applies to leadership -intentional reflecting as it occurs in the "here and now".  Too often we are constrained by policy or a "must do" agenda leaving no time to pause and reflect on practice (leadership or teaching).  This is a tension that I often struggle with in my workplace.  I identify with Latta and Kim’s description of a detached teacher and "survival mode" that only too often occurs in leadership positions as well; not necessarily because "the agenda" and "meeting the deadlines" are at the core of what one values, instead, due to multiple demands and competing priorities, it becomes the only way to survive.  Not allowing a teacher/leader to infuse creativity into everyday practice may oppress not only the teacher/leader but also the students/staff.

 I also really like the fundamental principle in the Saber Tooth Curriculum story.  Learning must be practical yet broad enough to be meaningful and applicable so that it endures the test of time - curriculum needs to teach how to apply principles rather than be confined to a specific task.  In my work setting I am always concerned that new nurses know how important it is know broad principles and how to apply them – to teach  "how" to find the answer to questions and for the learner to understand the principle or concept of learning and its application rather then teaching the answer to every question.  It is important to teach (as the Saber Tooth article implies) principles or concepts that can withstand the test of time.


What are the Saber Tooths’ or the forces and tensions or even ideologies or overlapping forces affecting me in everyday practice?

I think that one of the Saber Tooths’ in health care are that sometimes we are too quick to adopt "a new curriculum" and too quick to "let go" of old curriculum and modes of learning".  While budget constraints are a very real issue in health care, and no doubt health care dollars must be managed responsibly, I think we must be very cautious and always review and evaluate the impact on such cuts or reorganizing of programs (e.g. injury prevention and the importance of fitness and utilizing good body mechanics when transferring patients or heavy equipment).  Demographics indicate that our workforce is aging, and staff are working longer and sometimes in physically demanding jobs.  Changes to Injury prevention programs were initiated through reorganization and cutbacks, and a new curriculum emerged in the more economical 'Safe transfers" web-based learning module.   However, not all staff are comfortable utilizing the computers to engage in web-based learning.  The costs associated with staff injury due to patient or equipment transfer is extremely costly to the health care system not to mention the impact injuries have on staff personally. The yearly "hands on" review of correct body mechanics for transferring patients review was eliminated in the reorganizing of curriculum.  Maybe a "hands on” component in the curriculum might need to be reintroduced again or at the very least a module at the new employee orientation should include practical application on how to access your email and pay stub and sign up and navigate through online web based learning modules. 

These readings raise many more questions for me…. I wonder how and if we are meeting the needs of our new nurses coming into the workplace fresh from an “idealistic” program?
I wonder how we can ensure that all of our staff are engaged in learning – learning that has content that is appropriate to their individual learning style, experiences and capabilities.  I wonder how and if we are meeting the needs of our staff when I think about  “moral distress” in the workplace… asking them to do more with less such as taking care of patients in sub-optimal physical space due to congestion issues within the system?  Is there programs or curriculum that needs to be modified to ensure that we address how to effectively deal with moral and ethical stress and inner conflict?   

These first week of classes and the readings we discussed remind me of how important it is to take time in any work setting to step back and reflect and reflex on experiences as they are occurring in the “hear and now”.